- As many of you know I use the moniker FVS on Disqus.
- I hope you find this as ammusing as I do.
Chris Smitha day ago
No worries. Once Trump is out of office that treasonous POS who continues to defile our nation’s White House on a daily basis will be indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced into a federal penitentiary for the remainder of his miserable existence. Mark these words.From a veteran.
In retrospect I REALLY sucked Chris Smitha day ago
SO go ahead and lay out that case for treason Bufford.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Chris Smith In retrospect I REALLY suckeda day ago
Read the Mueller Report in its entirety and pull yourself out of your pit of ignorance and cowardice.
FVS Chris Smitha day ago
Maybe you should, seeing as it states that there is nothing PROSECUTABLE either now or after he is out of office. But of course you don't care about facts, only your butthurt emotions. Come on genius show us where Mueller's report cites a single chapter of the US code as relates to either collusion/conspiricy or obstruction of justice that was violated by the President, any of his family members, or their campaign or personal staffs.Oh wait you can't because it doesn't. Thank you for your service but enough of the "from a veteran" crap. That loans nothing to the value of your OPINION. In fact I would say it detracts from it because you are so demonstrably wrong.
Chris Smith FVSa day ago
Penning as someone who attended law school I will state with complete authority that you have not a clue as to what you spew.
FVS Chris Smitha day ago
Attended and apparently failed miserably. Any criminal charging document, regardless of the level of government, MUST include by law a citation of the chapter of the criminal code that it alleges to have been violated. Read the report law school dropout. There is not a single charge made or any chapter of the US Code cited as having been violated. "Obstructive acts" is not a legal term no matter how much your clearly limited intellect wishes it were.
Try again dropout.
FVS Chris Smitha day ago
So prove me wrong you "wish I was a lawyer but couldn't cut it" pathetic dropout.
Oh wait you can't. Why? Because you're a stupid loser who stuck his neck out with "I attended law school" and got your head chopped off. Do yourself a favor, spare yourself any further humiliation and just STFU and go away!
Chris Smith FVSa day ago
Little insignificant man, would you care/dare to compare and contrast our respective resumes? POST IT, you uneducated intellectual lightweight!I AM WAITING! I AM CALLING YOUR PATHETIC BLUFF AND YOUR BIG MOUTH!
FVS Chris Smith19 hours ago
Nice try at deflection there dropout. I don't give a crap about your resume. What I do want to point out is that you are either ignorant or deceitful. Prove me wrong a hole.
Get a clue loser the US Code on obstruction of justice ONLY applies to interference in legal proceedings. The SCOTUS has previously ruled that an investigation IS NOT A LEGAL PROCEEDING.
Show me how me how formal charges can be filed in any jurisdiction in the US without citing the law by code and number that is alleged to have been violated. The police can't even give you a speeding ticket without citing a specific code number.
Now show me where in Mueller's report he cites any law in the US code by number relating to collusion/conspiricy or obstruction of justice that he alleges to have been violated by anyone never mind the President.YOU WON'T, BECAUSE YOU CAN'T, BECAUSE THEY DON'T EXIST. Kind of like you legal training.So take your resume in butthurt, slather it with Preparation H and stick it where it might do you some good. You have been owned. Now go away, sit down and STFU!
Chris Smith FVS18 hours ago
Not on the best day of your pathetic existence, snowflake.I called your bluff and your big mouth. And just as I anticipated, you folded like a gutless, spineless coward.Now I’ll ask again, you intellectual lightweight. At which law school did you (never) matriculate?I’d wager $10,000 that you never earned anything more than a meager HS diploma due to (a) obviously limited intellect, and (b) your lifetime of sloth and laziness.Own it, you candy derrièred punk who is not fit to shine my shoes.
- FVS Chris Smith 10 hours ago
Firstly, I never claimed to have a JD or to have even attended any law school.
Secondly, I don't see how anybodys resumé has anything to do with easily discernible facts. Hint: it doesn't take a JD to read or understand the English language.
Thirdly, Neither does it take a genius to see that you are avoiding the questions posed. Why? Because you can't answer them in a way that supports your position.
Fourthly, If you could you would but you can't so you resort to deflection and trying to change the subject.Trouble you have is that you are not the first deceitful, lying, leftist fool I have had try this. Stick to the subject at hand a hole. Oh wait you can't because simple easily observable facts (how things really are) conflicts with how you want them to be.
This is what is known as cognitive dissonance. And I'm sure it causes you a certain degree of mental anguish and confusion.
My reaction to that? GOOD! You've earned it. I hope it's painful and keeps you awake at night. The thought that it might makes me smile.Oh and one more thing. If you are so damn smart and confident in your positions/opinions why is your profile private? Are you afraid of being held accountable for your fraud, deceit and lies?Go away fool. You have nothing. Kind of like the Mueller report!
- As of this point on Saturday afternoon I have heard nothing more from the inestimable Mr. Smith.
