All of the clamoring on the left is being manufactured to create chaos and destabilize the government. Let's be honest here. All of these Confederate statues and memorials have been standing for well over a hundred years, some for nearly a hundred and fifty.
Other than for maybe once a year, when the Daughters of Confederate Veterans lay a wreath at a few selected memorials, they go completely ignored. Countless millions drive or walk past them everyday and don't give them a first thought or glance never mind a second one.
Don't kid yourself. None of this is about tearing down Confederate statues. It's about tearing down the very structures of and foundations of liberty and freedom themselves. The worst and most violent, hate filled aspects of Communism didn't die with the fall of the Soviet Union. They just went underground for a while, only to emerge again like a cancer coming out of remission, with renewed and increased destructive intent.
There is no possible doubt that it is this revived communism that is behind the vast majority of violence we are experiencing. Confederate statues are just a convenient instrument. If they weren't openly clamoring about these all but forgotten statues the neo Nazis and Klan would have largely stayed under their rocks and this young lady in Charlottesville would still be alive.
It is the violent and vocal left that has repeatedly shut down the freedom of speech of those they disagree with. In the face of this tyranny the media stands complicit in their silence and complacency, refusing to acknowledge the most basic truth that without freedom of speech for all there is freedom for no one.
The goals of the left are not destroying statues or Christian bakers and florists or demanding transgendered bathrooms. Their goals are the destruction of the west, individual liberty and personal responsibility. Their interest is not in removing "white supremacy" but replacing it with their own supremacy. Such is as it is in any Communist tyranny. Given the opportunity they would replace these statues with a pantheon of murderous icons of the left.
They would have us all become Winston Smith, shut up and obey. For them Orwell's 1984 is not a warning but an instruction manual. SCRATCH A COMMUNIST AND YOU WILL FIND A FASCIST EVERY TIME.
The URL of this blog comes from a no longer published newspaper from my old home town in Massachusetts. "The Evening Chronicle" was owned and published by an old family friend and long time leader of the Republican Party from the Roosevelt Administration through the Eisenhower Administration, Joseph W. Martin Jr. I hope you all enjoy what you find here.
Saturday, August 19, 2017
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
A Wonderful Dose Of Irony.
It has been reported on several occasions that Canada has been facing a large influx of illegal aliens fleeing possible deportation from the US as part of ICE doing its job. It seems however, contrary to many years of Canada lecturing Americans about our being intolerant and unwelcoming, that these holier than tho Canadians are finding that the unrestricted flow of largely uneducated, low IQ and often disease infested aliens has a large negative economic impact.
It also seems that these sanctimonious Canadians are particularly uncomfortable with the large numbers of Haitians that have been crossing at an obscure crossing point at Champlain NY. Now you would think Canadians, especially French Canadians would be welcoming to "refugees" from the only other French speaking nation in the western hemisphere.
Apparently not, as military troops have been brought in to help confine the influx to tent cities. Tent cities that one might honestly expect will eventually turn in to refugee camps whose underlying purpose will be to prevent them from spreading into the cities and creating scenes of chaos as are now being created I'm Paris and elsewhere in France where Africans are living on the streets and turning them into garbage strewn open sewers.
As far as I'm concerned the Canadians should keep them and do what they want with them beyond that, except of course send them back here. I also have no doubt that as far as them being granted refugee status by the Canadian government the Haitians will be low priority and that actual French fleeing the chaos in Europe will be at the top of the list, if not given expedited status. The Haitians will be largely kept confined to refugee centers, out of sight is out of mind after all.
Could it be that someone in the Trudeau government has realized that these people cannot and will not ever assimilate into western culture? After all just how many domestics do the elite of Montreal and Quebec City really need?
Pass the escargot, frog legs and horse meat steaks please!
Some how I doubt they a ready for a Canadian winter. Come November they will be begging to be sent back to Florida. Hey Justin, they're yours. |
Apparently not, as military troops have been brought in to help confine the influx to tent cities. Tent cities that one might honestly expect will eventually turn in to refugee camps whose underlying purpose will be to prevent them from spreading into the cities and creating scenes of chaos as are now being created I'm Paris and elsewhere in France where Africans are living on the streets and turning them into garbage strewn open sewers.
As far as I'm concerned the Canadians should keep them and do what they want with them beyond that, except of course send them back here. I also have no doubt that as far as them being granted refugee status by the Canadian government the Haitians will be low priority and that actual French fleeing the chaos in Europe will be at the top of the list, if not given expedited status. The Haitians will be largely kept confined to refugee centers, out of sight is out of mind after all.
Could it be that someone in the Trudeau government has realized that these people cannot and will not ever assimilate into western culture? After all just how many domestics do the elite of Montreal and Quebec City really need?
Pass the escargot, frog legs and horse meat steaks please!
Monday, August 7, 2017
Just How Ignorant Can Leftists Get?
I recently had occasion to engage a young lady of the "liberal" persuasion in a political discussion. A typical leftist, she soon displayed her complete ignorance of history. She had not the slightest clue of the intersection between Islam and the Nazis.
So ignorant was she that she actually posited to me that that Muhammad and the establishment of Islam was historically concurrent with St. Peter and the foundation of the Catholic Church in Rome. She further claimed that North Africa had always been Muslim. Seriously this young lady actually believed these absurdities.
Rather than asking her how stupid she really was, I asked her if she knew the difference was between 64 and 635. Realising at that point that she had painted herself into a corner, rather than answering the question, she responded that "I hate Socratic arguments," I.e. "I hate reason and logic." If ever there was an admission that not only had she lost the argument but that she really had no argument to begin with, that was it. She then retreated and left before she could further embarrass herself.
That was to bad because I only had one more question for her. Namely, "How can you expect to form cognizant opinions about a question of present circumstances when you are admittedly ignorant of the established events of the past from which they originate?
So ignorant was she that she actually posited to me that that Muhammad and the establishment of Islam was historically concurrent with St. Peter and the foundation of the Catholic Church in Rome. She further claimed that North Africa had always been Muslim. Seriously this young lady actually believed these absurdities.
Rather than asking her how stupid she really was, I asked her if she knew the difference was between 64 and 635. Realising at that point that she had painted herself into a corner, rather than answering the question, she responded that "I hate Socratic arguments," I.e. "I hate reason and logic." If ever there was an admission that not only had she lost the argument but that she really had no argument to begin with, that was it. She then retreated and left before she could further embarrass herself.
That was to bad because I only had one more question for her. Namely, "How can you expect to form cognizant opinions about a question of present circumstances when you are admittedly ignorant of the established events of the past from which they originate?