Are Cracks Beginning To Show In Hillary's Media Wall?

In the past week or so the AP, The Hill and now ABC news have all run stories exposing serious questions about the intermingled operations of Hillary's tenure ate the State Department and the Clinton Family Foundation. This raises at least two potential questions.

• Is the MSM beginning to hedge their bets on Hillary?
• Has a decision been made that questions about improprieties at State are more controllable and or carry less potential than the questions about her health?

Personally my bet would be on the latter. It is interesting to note that the most damaging revelations about Hillary's using the State Department as an adjunct to money raising operations of the Clinton Foundation are coming not from examining Hillary's email account but those of her staff who were clearly working both sides of the street, for State and for the Foundation. It also seems pretty clear where their loyalties are.

Frankly I can't wait for Labor Day to come and be gone. After which I suspect that,

• Trump will begin releasing a steady torrent of advertising.
• WikiLeaks will open the spigots on what will be more than the slow drip, of the past few weeks but a steady stream of dirty Clinton water. Culminating in a mud bath around the third week of October.

Hand up Ms. Clinton, you're under arrest
for crimes against humanity.

It should all prove to be unprecedentedly delicious. How much fraud the Democrats manage to pull off at the polls remains to be seen. But I sincerely hope the margin will be an American Brexit in the end. An end the will let us finally close the ugly chapter of the Clinton Arkansas Mafia for once and for all.

An Introduction To The Alt-Right.

Recently came across this piece. It's about as good an explanation as can be found. My congratulations to the author.

http://www.staresattheworld.com/2016/08/introduction-alt-right/

Is Someone Inside The Clinton Campaign Setting Her Up?

All the latest media buzz has been about her commercial trying to portray Donald Trump as a racist and guilty by association because some alleged KKK members claims to support Trump.

As much as the Clintons would like to play up these so-called endorsements there hardly remains much of the Klan in either numbers, social or political influence. White supremacists exist primarily in isolated compounds in Northwest.  Like the Klan their presence on the internet is grossly out of proportion to their actual numbers or influence.

That said I highly doubt that any actual connection can be made between Mr. Trump and any of these dubious individuals and their endorsements. But perhaps is Hillary making these accusations from that proverbial glass house?

I'm not speaking of Hillary having claimed former KKK Grand Dragon and West Virgina Senator Robert Bird as her mentor or Bill having claimed Arkansas's avowed racist Senator J. William Fulbright as his own mentor.

No I'm talking about the long list of convicted felons associated with the Clinton's fund raising and money laundering operations.

Webster Hubbell. Former Hillary law firm partner. Pleaded guilty to stealing nearly ,$400,000 from other partners and clients.

Hassan Namazee. Hillary's national finance director during her 2008 campaign and a leading fundraiser for Bill legal defense fund. In 2010 he pleaded guilty to stealing hundreds of millions of dollars to by New York real estate and to funnel into Clinton and other Democrat political campaigns.

Johnny Chung. Chung confessed to funneling illegal Chinese monies into Democrat and Bill Clinton's 1996 reelection campaign. His crimes included delivering a $50,000 check the Hillary's chief of staff in the White House.

Norman Hsu. A former top bundler for Hillary's 2008 campaign until it was revealed that he was an interstate fugitive wanted on a California warrant for bilking millions of dollars from investors in a Ponzi scheme.

Sandy Berger. Berger was a foreign policy advisor to both the Clinton's and then became National Security Advisor during Bill Clinton's term. Berger was later caught stealing files from the National Archive by hiding them in his socks. The files were later recovered from a construction site in Washington DC. Berger was forced to surrender his law licence.

James McDougall. Former Business partner of the Clintons. Was convicted of 18 counts of fraud in connection with his failed savings and loan business and sentenced to prison.

Charlie Trie. Another Chinese campaign bundler who pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations and spiked hgis guts to the Feds on how he and others manipulated the system to pour money into the Democrats and Clinton's campaigns. A Senate investigation concluded he had significant connections to the Chinese government and intelligence operations.

Mark Rich. The biggest crook of them all. Rich was indicted on fraud charges that carried as much as 300 years in prison. He fled to Switzerland to avoid prosecution. In one of Bill's final acts he pardoned Rich, which was soon followed by his ex wife making huge donations to Bill Presidential Library, Hillary's Senate campaign and other Clinton political operation. Even Jimmy Carter dismissed the pardon as "disgusting".

I would like to see Hillary deny that she knew any of these scumbags. But don't worry the MSM isn't about to bring up any of this history. One can only wonder why the Clinton Campaign would deliberately invite such an attack and what the Trump campaign is waiting for. The pile of available rocks to throw is hugh. Time to start breaking some glass.

Is Panic Setting In At The Clinton Campaign?

During a Federal course hearing today Judge James Boasberg ordered the State Department to complete their review of some 15,000 newly discovered documents from Hillary's tenure as Secretary by Sept. 22nd and report to him by that date. All of these documents had not been turned over by Hillary's lawyers as requested but we're discovered by the FBI during their investigation. Although the judge has not yet set a release schedule yet it's a pretty sure bet that the State Dept. will do its best to delay the review and release until after Nov. 8th.

Just the fact that these documents were not there over as ordered certainly suggest that at least some of them contain information Hillary does not want seen by the public. Now wether this judge has the balls to really stand up to the Clintons remains to be seen. So far he has not ordered her attorneys to appear to explain why the previous court order was not fully complied with. Anyone else but the Clintons would be facing obstruction of justice charges regardless of the content.

In another interesting notes on the leaked documents front a European judge has ruled that the sudden death of Julian Assange's attorney was not a suicide as claimed by some in the Clinton sycophantic media. Add in the revelation that an as yet unknown individual ascaled the outside wall and attempted to gain access to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London last night. Wether this was an assassination attempt gone awry or was just a probe of the security set up cannot be said. It's a pretty sure bet that security will be increased in short order and that Assange my work accelerate his already planned release of more damaging documents.

It's for certain that this election is far from over. And that the Clintons have much to be worried about, win or lose.

More Bad Optics For Hillary.

Today both Donald Trump and Gov. Pence arrived in Baton Rouge LA. to tour the areas devastated by the floods and meet directly with the victims both in private and at shelters where food was being distributed.

Mean while Hillary is in Provincetown MA holding a fundraiser with Cher and the artsy gay crowd while the President refuses to leave the golf course on Martha's Vineyard long enough to make a press statement never mind visit the devastated area. His crass behavior makes Bush during Katrina look like a virtual saint.

But what does he care? He's out in January and has no political stake left. The good thing is that by his sitting on his hands puts a big road block in front of Hillary who now can't go for fear of it showing up her leading supporter. These people are just some special kind of stupid!

Nancy Pelosi Opens Her Mouth To Lie, Only To Reveal Another Truth

To say that Hillary Clinton's campaign has been marked, from its very beginning, by unwanted revelations would be an understatement. The response to each new revelation has more absurd than the previous one. Yesterday they trotted out the queen of absurdities to unveil their newest tactic.

The Democrats are fully aware that more hacked documents are going to be revealed,p and bring fully aware that their systems have been compromised they are also fully aware what has been hacked. Of course Hillary herself can't be seen to be preemptively on the defensive so out comes Nancy "If you want to see the bill you have to pass the bill" Pelosi to pronounce that the next release of materials will be riddled with forgeries.

Never mind that when faced with the DNC email release they never bothered with such a claim. They were far to busy trying to distract from actual content by blaming the Russians for the hack. They of course never stopped to think at the moment that such a position revealed the cognitive dissonance of claiming the one hand that while it was the best Russians who hacked the DNC, on the otherhand couldn't possibly have hacked Hillary's unsecured bathroom closet email system. Never mind that if there are as any metadata in any of the files that pointed to the Russians they would have produced it.

It doesn't take a public relations genius to see that this of smacks of desperation that can only come from knowing exactly how damaging the next round of hacked material will be.

This is not to say that the Russians aren't fully capable of producing forgeries. But why would they risk that if the truth would be just as damning?

For all their claims of bring "progressive" the Democrats seem to be getting squeezed in the transition from the old media to the new. While they gave all but had the traditional MSM in their pocket for decades, the new world of internet media is the wild west by comparrison and these old line Democrats certainly appear to be out of their league.

So let the assault from WikiLeaks and the others continue! Watching these condescending and pathological liars stew in the juices of their own contemptuous plots is going to be the show of the century.

More Phony Outrage.

The only major change in newspapers over the last half a century is consolidation of ownership into the hands of a few corporate giants.  Time was if you didn't like the bias, propaganda, yellow journalism (call it what you will) from one paper. You could step to the other end of the news stand and find one that presented a different view or find one with a view different than either of the others.

In the public realm that almost never happens anymore. Outside of three or four of the largest cities there is only one paper available and most of these are owned by chains controlled by the large papers like the NYTimes, the Chicago Tribute or the Los Angles time. They even freely print each other's opinions and so-called news stories so freely as to be completely homogenous in there out put.

They all preach "diversity" except in that one most important realm - opinion! The NYTimes has even written that when it comes to Donald Trump they no longer feel they have any obligation to journalist ethics! As if they hadn't abandoned those years ago.

A media system wants ostensible diversity
that masks uniformity. 

The "fourth estate" is no longer the people's watchdog on government corruption and fraud. It has become government's mouthpiece, its ministry of propaganda. Joseph Goebbels is looking up from hell and smiling as newspapers and news media have sold their souls to the same devil he served.

Rules? What Rules?

Given that the New York Times, the so-called "paper of record" has openly stated that journalists should have no compunctions about adhering to any ethical standards when presenting stories about Donald Trump, why would anyone expect anything they produce to be anything but lies and distortions?

If so-called news operations like ABC can deliberately cut away from a live feed at a Trump rally when he starts to talk about Hillary's and Obama's responsibility for not only creating ISIS but providing the conditions that have allowed it to grow, not even claiming "technical difficulties", why then should Mr. Trump feel obliged to adhere to sny rules the media might establish for the debates?

Then when Mr. Trump calls them out for their lies and distortions and naked dishonesty they bellow with self-righteousness about his ethics! Well just what do we expect from a media that is little more than the propaganda arm of the Democrat party except hypocrisy and more lies?

I can only hope that Mr. Trump's operations are quietly planning to turn the first debate on its head and expose both Hillary and the media for the criminal conspiracy, sewer dwelling garbage that they are. I hope during his opening statements he presents them both with a list of question for Hillary that they would never ask and Hillary would never dare answer.

What ever transpires out of it will be delicious! The media assholes will either be forced to ask those questions or look like the bought and paid for fools they are. Hillary will be either be forced to answer them or stumble into an absurd, obstructionist answer such as saying "Under the rules of the debate Mr. Trump isn't allowed to ask me direct questions..." and look the fool herself.

Better yet perhaps she will "short circuit" and get that deer in the headlights look she has displayed so often lately or risk having one of her handlers rush to her side and give her some sort of a key phrase to kick-start her "short circuited" and damaged brain.

Given the avalanche of media attacks and distortions Trump has nothing to lose by such a tactic. Yes those same media outlets will immediately be filled with outrage about how mean spirited Trump's attack on Hillary is, as if she were some fragile child who's "safe space" has been violated and who's feelings must not be hurt by such forceful rhetoric.

But the damage will be done and Trump can then flood the air waves and internet with clips from the live on air meltdown. Even more delicious, short of her slipping into a state of catatonia, will be that Hillary will never let go of the nomination she has coveted and lusted after for twenty plus years.

The obvious question for voters will become: If she can't handle the rough and tumble of a debate how can she handle the unrelenting pressure of the most stressful job in the world?

Is Hillary Clinton Going To Have A Richard Nixon Moment?

I will always remember sitting down to breakfast with my parents one July morning in 1974. I had just returned from a six month motorcycle tour of Europe and North Africa and my father and I were both working for Electric Boat Company in Groton Connecticut. My father, a retired Navy officer and life long Republican, took a long look and his scrambled eggs and bacon and suddenly, seemingly blurted out of nowhere, "I've about had enough of Richard Nixon!" I reached down and picked my jaw up off the table, bit my tongue, and quietly realized that Nixon was finished.

I can't help but wonder if that in 2016 there aren't a certain number of old line Democrats for whom the lies piled upon lies and revelations piled upon revelations aren't building to that same sort of moment where the pile collapses of its own weight and they say, if not out loud as my father did, but to themselves, "I've about had enough of Hillary Clinton!"

Hillary's Medical Records?

From my friend Gary at Coyote Prime.

If this is real Hillary should be finished.

http://coyoteprime-runningcauseicantfly.blogspot.com/2016/08/report-hillary-medical-records-revealed.html?m=1

Check it out and decide for yourself. If you think it needs be, pass it on.

Hillary's Delusions And Failing Health.

Hillary has been deluding herself for some 12 years that with the MSM firmly in her pocket, there is nothing that can obstruct her path to the White House. She found out differently in 2008 but her delusions just carry on. But now it is 2016 and social media has turned the corner on having a far broader sway in public opinion than the old line media operations.

This can only be an activating and contributing factor in her stress and obviously deteriorating health. I'm not a Doctor but I'm pretty sure any Doctor worth his salt will confirm that stress is bad for people who have suffered from concussions and cerebral embolisms. In short Hillary is potentially commiting suicide in pursuit of power.

That her husband and daughter and handlers know this in and of itself should cause anyone to ask what the hell is going on. That her chief handler on the campaign trail has now been revealed to be a physician should only reinforce the necessity of the question.  If any candidate other than Hillary Clinton had a physician at their side at every campaign appearance the news media would be demanding the release of health records immediately and unrelentingly.

When Thomas Eagleton's history of repeated hospitalizations for depression were revealed in 1972 there was no question that any such serious a condition precluded his having any position on the ballot.  That such established precedent does not apply to Hillary Clinton is just another example of the naked hypocrisy of the establishment media.

Such a breach of ethics should surprise no one. Their questions were completely absent when the Clinton campaign claimed with utter certainty the it was the Russians who had hacked the DNC email server while at the same time continuing to claim with the same certainty that no one especially not the Russians had hacked her unsecured bathroom email server.

They have become so wonton in their corruption that the NY Times claims that it is Trump that is at fault for stretching the boundaries of the journalistic credibility. Should Hillary collapse into a seizure or death during one of the debates they will no doubt blame Trump for confronting her not question her reckless behavior with her health. Neither will they question their part and responsibilities for not examining the obvious. I don't think the public on either side of the ballot will be so generous with their oblivion.

The New York Times, Always Good For A Laugh.

Just today the New York Times produced the most hilariously absurd headlines I have yet seen. "Trump Is Testing the Norms of Objectivity in Journalism". Seriously? The only people who could possibly believe that the NYT even knows what "objectivity" means is the editorial board of the NYT. Of course should they ever publish an article that is actually objective, hell will freeze over faster than a bad Hollywood environmentalist movie. But then if they did what little ad revenue they have left would disappear overnight.

These media outlets act and think like the public is just plain to stupid to notice that they play these ugly tricks. Tricks like the one ABC News played while covering a Trump speech live wherein when Trump started talking about how Hillary's actions at State facilitated the rise of ISIS they simply cut the feed and played elevator music until that portion of the speech ended. They didn't even attempt to hide their bias by claiming "technical difficulties". They are that naked in their being in the tank for Hillary.

But yeah us rubes in flyover country just can't see it.

Enough Is Enough Is Enough. Time To Issue A Fair Warning

A week or so ago I wrote a piece asking when the public would reach its tipping point in regards to the ongoing human slaughter at the hands of Islam. Well today I reached a tipping point of my own. Not in regards to Islam per se, but in regards to all the whimpering, crybaby, selfish, petulant jerks of the so called Republican pundit class. These self appointed Czars of conservative orthodoxy have finally pushed to far.

I can't  and won't claim to speak for anyone but myself, but I know I am not alone in the feelings I am about to express. But I would appreciate my readers who share this opinion to pass it on to any and all of their like minded friends.

Collectively this entire bunch oh know-it-alls has been bellyacheing about the poison of political correctness for the last two decades at least. For nearly as long we've heard lecture after lecture about how foolish and destructive Bush Derangement Syndrome was/is and that it was little more than a rhetorical distraction from the political class's (both Republicans and Democrats) inability and to get anything done beyond running their mouths about what they claimed to think needs to be done.

Well now the primary season is over and for the first time in over a third of a century the Republican voters have demonstrated loud and clear who and what they want. And guess what, it is exactly what these selfish jerks have been claiming they stand for for just about as long.  Only problem is Trump actually means it and he is giving no indication that he is going to sell out to the apparatchiks of Wall Street and the one party state.

None of this is to say that some of these pundits haven't produced some insightful work. Charles Krauthammer and George Will have had their moments, even if George is past his expiration date and would be better served to retire and concentrate on writing about Baseball. Bernie Goldberg's several works on the naked bias of the news media remain as relevant as ever. (Perhaps he should go back and read some of them while looking in the mirror.) Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism" is an absolute 21st century tour de force and should be required reading in every history AND philosophy curriculum in the country. That leaves Bill Kristol who isn't even a has been, he's just a sanctimonious never was, with money as far as I'm concerned.

All that said for all their past efforts, come 2016 and Donald Trump, who clearly has no interest in bending to their interpretation of what conservatism is or should be, they all have their panties in a massive collective bunch. We get it, they're not particularly happy about having a Republican nominee who espouses his disgust with political correctness, his contempt for the fecklessness of the Democrats, expresses his desire to put the interest of the American people first on his agenda and but at the same but time has no interest in kissing their backsides or advancing the aggressive neocon agenda of endless war and endless debt. So rather than shutting up and holding their noses for Trump, exactly as so many of us did for Romney, McCain and the Bushes, they have responded to this giant hemroidal panty wad by effortlessly and collectively, taking the shoe of political correctness and Bush Derangement Syndrome off of their left foot, crossed off Bush, added Trump and slipped it back on their right foot without the slightest bit of discomfort.

Through all this apparently none of them can see nor admit what pathetic hypocrites they are making of themselves. All their pontifications in their weekly columns about wanting what's in the best interest of the country and the people is exposed as just as much of a lie as the same garbage when it comes out of the mouths of the Democrats. No different than the Democrats, they are wedded to the interests of the party, Wall Street bailouts and neocon globslist interventions.

These jerks, every one of them know perfectly well that a Hillary Clinton administration and her appointing the next two or three Supreme Court Justices will be the end of the American experiment in Republican representative government just as surely as Augustus's reign sealed the fate of the Roman Republic. Many of them have even said so themselves. But they have let their smallnes, their petulance and their own high opinion of themselves come to out weigh any loyalty they had to the Constitution, the Republic and the American people. And yes I deliberately constructed that last sentence in the past tense.

Today's column by Bernie Goldberg, insinuating that Donald Trump was nothing more than a cat's paw for the Clintons has simply pushed me over the edge of civil restraint. As the title of this piece says: Enough is enough is enough. So rather launch into a string of well deserved vituperations, name calling and my own insinuations about their characters, I will issue them all a fair warning.

Should Hillary Clinton prevail in November it will not just be by whatever corruptions and frauds she and the Democrats cook up. It will be equally because they have continued to spread deception, dissention and division on the right. They will in fact be even more responsible for the death of the Republic than even Hillary herself simply because they know better.

As part and parcel of the destruction of our rights and freedoms that she will bring about, they should not be so further deluded as to think they will be immune from the wrath of those patriots who will not go quietly into the dark night of socialist tyranny. The politicians might be able to spend our money to build higher fences around the White House and Congress. Hell they can wall off all of DC for all I care. That won't change the fact that we know exactly who these sniveling little worms are and what they will have done. I'll leave it to their own imaginations as to what their fates might become should righteous indignation come combined with broken patience.

The Conventions Are Over, Let The Dirty Tricks Begin.

It's been said before and I'll say it again. In order to win, especially against the Clinton machine, Trump will have to secure enough votes to overcome the margin of fraud. 

Now that the conventions are over, the Clintons focus of dirty tricks has shifted from the hapless Bernie Sanders to the Trump campaign. The first round appears to be to recruit fire marshals in Democrat enclaves to limit the number of individuals allowed into Trump rallies regardless of the size or capacity of the venue. This is of course an attempt to create the optics that Trump's popularity is waining. That this has happened in more than one venue and that the mayor in one of the location had campaigned with Hillary just the day before is substantial evidence of an existing conspiracy.

If Trump's people are smart, and I'm sure they are, they will be preparing two sets of legal documents. The first being FOIA requests for emails and phone logs connecting these local officials and Clinton operatives. The second would be preliminary preparations for law suits to be presented by his advance teams to at least bring this one despicable practice to an end. No doubt there will be more.